DATACAREERHUB / PRODUCT ANALYTICS

Counts you can inspect.
Decisions you can explain.

Worked reference · Fictional source data · No live tracking or experiment

Teaching evidence only. The experiment outcomes were deliberately manufactured. They do not establish a real treatment effect. Public registration and payments remain disabled.

01 / A defined funnel

Unique eligible users · First-start attempt · Strict order · Inclusive 72-hour deadline

Start: 12 usersLesson: 8Exercise: 5

Overall: 5/12 = 41.67%
Conditional: 8/12 = 66.67%; 5/8 = 62.50%.

Recorded stopping points do not explain motivation. Repeated or out-of-order actions do not create extra converters.

02 / Source reconciliation

Event delivery records, not people
Raw rows45
Exact delivery retry−1
Internal event−1
At/after watermark−2
Accepted41

13 signup records − 1 internal account = 12 eligible users. Source assumed complete strictly before 26 January 2026, 00:00 UTC.

03 / Compare the same product age

Exact elapsed-day practice return; Monday UTC signup cohorts
Signup weekUsersDay 1Day 7
5 Jan 202643/4 · 75%2/4 · 50%
12 Jan 202642/4 · 50%1/4 · 25%
19 Jan 202641/4 · 25%N/A · not mature

Mature day-7 return: 3/8 = 37.50%. Day 7 means [signup + 7 days, signup + 8 days). The latest cohort is unobservable, not 0%. The whole cohort row is withheld until every member has complete follow-up.

Small observational cohorts. No causal or forecast claim. Day-8 returns do not count for exact day 7.

04 / A positive estimate with substantial uncertainty

Separate synthetic experiment; original assigned-user denominator
ArmAssignedCompletedRateError users
Control1002020%5
Treatment1002828%7

Difference: +8 percentage points · Relative lift: +40%.
Approximate 95% interval: −3.79 to +19.79 percentage points.

Experiment effect and approximate 95 percent intervalAxis from minus ten to plus twenty five percentage points. Point estimate plus eight. Interval minus3.79 to plus19.79 crosses zero: inconclusive.−100+10+20+8 pp

Independent-user, fixed-horizon unpooled normal approximation. Sparse outcomes are refused by the reference; no cluster, sequential or equivalence inference is supplied.

100/100 passes the illustrative binomial SRM check. That diagnostic assumes independent 50:50 assignment; this fixture uses a fixed-count balanced shuffle, so a real check must match its allocation design. Illustrative sample plan: baseline 20%, absolute MDE 8 points, two-sided alpha .05, power .80 → approximately 447 per arm. Error counts are too sparse for this kit’s normal interval; they do not establish safety.

05 / What to do with this evidence

Investigate recorded first-step progression and event delivery. Keep the retention denominator restricted to mature cohorts. Do not call the manufactured treatment a winner. A real follow-up needs a reviewed assignment design, adequate sample, complete observation and a predeclared guardrail decision rule.

Read all eight lessons · Compare worked solutions · Read the worked decision memo